News

US files landmark lawsuit against Apple

The United States of America has officially filed a landmark case against the tech giant Apple for monopolising the smartphone market.

The US added that the action by Apply is also crushing competition within the smartphone market.

Per the details of the lawsuit, Apply is accused of using its iPhone control to limit other competitors and users of its products illegitimately, which has limited options available to consumers.

The action by Apple is believed to have further weakened competition and “killed” new apps, which reduced rival product’s ability to break into the market.

However, Apple has indicated that it is ready to “vigorously” fight the lawsuit and denies the claims made against the brand.

The complaint filed at the federal court in New Jersey alleged that Apple used “a series of shapeshifting rules” in a bid to “thwart innovation” and “throttle” competitors.

The complaint filed also indicated that Apple stopped its competitors from providing services on the iPhone and made it tough for users to use alternative operating systems.

The actions by Apple have been described by Attorney General Merrick Garland as an attempt to “undermine apps, products, and services that would otherwise make users less reliant on the iPhone.”.

The lawsuit filed outlines a list of alleged “anti-competitive” strategies implemented by Apple.

They include the following:

Apple is blocking apps.
Apple is suppressing mobile cloud streaming services.
Apple is limiting third-party digital wallets.
Apple is “diminishing the functionality” of smartwatches, which are not managed by Apple.

At a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Garland said Apple had “maintained its monopoly, not simply by staying ahead of the competition on the merits, but by violating federal antitrust laws.”.

“Consumers should not have to pay higher prices because companies break the law,” Mr. Garland said, accusing Apple of “locking its customers in” while at the same time “locking its competitors out.”.

He pointed to the experience of iPhone users who message non-Apple smartphones, which he said led to “limited functionality,” including non-encrypted communications and pixelated or grainy images.

“Apple creates barriers that make it extremely difficult and expensive for both users and developers to venture outside the Apple ecosystem,” Mr. Garland said.

If prosecutors succeed at trial, they could force Apple to alter contracts or possibly even make structural changes within the company, according to the complaint and officials at the press conference.

Those potential remedies are far off, and there are many possibilities, however.

According to Apple’s spokesperson, Fred Sainz, the lawsuit was not only wrong but also provided twisted facts. He said Apple was going to “vigorously defend against it.”.

“The lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets,” Mr. Sainz said. “If successful, it would hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people expect from Apple.”

This lawsuit is the third from the Justice Department, with the first one being laid before the court in 2009. However, this new lawsuit is the first antitrust challenge against Apple under the leadership of President Joe Biden’s administration.

READ: Adidas Unveil’s new Euro 2024 Kit for its Federations

Anat Alon-Beck, a business law professor at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, while speaking with the BBC on the lawsuit, did state that Apple was “systematically” excluding rivals from its ecosystem, which is indirectly destroying a lot of start-up businesses, stakeholders, and customers, as well as its shareholders.

The US lawsuit against Apple is expected to be a test case on monopolistic actions and if they are legal and provide fair playing grounds for modern businesses.